Mitropa Cup, Quarter-Final: 03/07/1932, Sunday, at 18:00.
Ferencváros F.C. — F.C. Juventus 3:3 (2:2)
Place: Üllői út, Budapest. 
Referee: Eugen Braun (Vienna)
Linesmen: ?
Estimated attendance: 8.000.

Ferencváros F.C.: Háda — Takács I., Korányi — Lyka, Sárosi(c), Lázár — Táncos, Takács II., Turay, Toldi, Kohut.
Coach: Zoltán Blum.

F.C. Juventus: Combi(c) — Rosetta, Caligaris — Varglien I., Monti, Bertolini — Sernagiotto, Cesarini, Vecchina, Ferrari, Orsi.
Coach: Carlo Carcano.

Goals: Sárosi(3: 15min[penalty], 18min[penalty], 80min[penalty]) — Orsi(25min), Cesarini(2: 30min, 65min).


The clash of styles and systems was notorious. Ferencváros, on the one hand, had a style that was not as effective as that of Juventus, who carried out the simple and turned his actions into goals. Ferencváros tried to complete actions the hard way, so there was a clear mitigation of chances on the part of Fradi's team. On the Juventus side, while their football was not equivalent to the performance at the Stadio Comunale, their fast, determined and objective football was enough to achieve a great result in Üllői út.

FERENCVÁROS F.C.

Another bad performance on the part of the Hungarians, Ferencváros' offensive line made the same mistakes as in Turin. Furthermore, the defensive system was precarious, too. Only the half-back line showed football above the other lines.

The goalkeeper Háda performed poorly. Takács I. was not enough to stop the offensive actions of Juventus forwards. Korányi was the least worst.

The half-back line was clearly Ferencváros' highlight. Sárosi was the best player of the match, only he made a spectacular performance on the Hungarian side. Lyka tried to nullify Orsi — a few failures on occasion — but performed a satisfactory match.

Fradi's attack was once again precarious and almost entirely mirrored the match in Turin. Toldi and Turay were the main names. On the right side of Fradi's advances, as they had already been severely criticized for their performances in the Comunale, Takács II. and Táncos were non-existent.

F.C. JUVENTUS.

Juventus played a match in the same way Bruno Roghi, the renowned editor of Gazzetta dello Sport, described what it would be like. Juventus were once again simple, precise and completely cold in their actions. Faster, more individualistic play and unexpected actions were crucial aspects of the visitors' performance.

Juventus knew perfectly how to behave in the direction of the match, they didn't let themselves be shaken when the score was 2:0 for Ferencváros, no. Juventus showed determination and superiority in their actions shortly after that. They even reversed the score of the match to 2:3. Juventus clearly were, without a single doubt, a team of strong psychological.

Combi, with the exception of the penalties, all and three unstoppable, did fully his duty and in front of him Rosetta and Caligaris fought well. Caligaris this time played a batter match than Rosetta.

The half-back line was the main reason for Juventus' affirmation in the next phase. They worked tirelessly from the first minute to the end of the match, especially Monti, the architect and main destroyer of Juventus. Varglien I. stood out more than Bertolini this time.

On the offensive line, Juventus repeated the highlights of the first game. Cesarini was the best of the forwards, without a doubt. When in great conditions Cesarini proves to be a player of the highest class. Orsi played at the height of his game. The movements, the knowledge of these two players is the main weapon of the Juventus offensive. Sernagiotto was better than in the first game, but below Orsi and Cesarini. Following them, Ferrari worked intensively and Vecchina played a regular game.

*   *   *

Mór Fischer: Even if the competent authorities do not meet now, Hungarian football will be ruined.

Dr. Lajos Mariássy: Ferencváros played well in the first quarter of an hour, after which the conditional disadvantage collided. The more sensible football was played by Juventus. It is not possible to say whether the direct defense or the line of attack was weaker in Ferenncváros.

Baron Manzoni: If we were judged like this, there would be at least fifty penalties for every match.

Carlo Carcano: The match was nicer in Turin, where both teams played better. The boys were upset, so there were so many clashes. The audience was very fair. We felt we were heading in our direction with friendly emotions. Sárosi is wonderful.

Dr. Taparone: Ferencváros played well but, like Turin, could not score a goal. Sárosi is great.

Pedro Sernagiotto: I'm not used to the team yet, so the game went weaker.

Mihály Pataky: The Italians are good. If we didn't get that equalizing goal after 2: 0, maybe we could have hoped... The result is realistic.

György Sárosi: Nothing to say.

Mihály Táncos: I have nothing to say.

Eugen Braun: I don't want to have a match like this many times! Three penalties are rarely awarded... Who was better? Well, I have no idea.

Sándor Bíró: Ferencváros played very badly, so they couldn't win.

Gusztáv Csárdás: The Italians were better, they deserve to advance in the cup. From Ferencváros, only Sárosi answered.