LAST UPDATE: 23/10/2024






Friendly match: 10/01/1926, Sunday, at 15:15. 
Red Star-Olympique — A.C. Sparta 3:11 (0:1)
Place: Stade Bergeyre, Paris.
Referee: Ilídio da Silva Nogueira (Lisbon, Portugal)
Linesmen: ?
Estimated attendance: 9.000.

Red Star-Olympique: Espanet — Audin, Langenove — Valade, Jourda, Dupoix — Cordon, Stuttler, Nicolas, Etienne, Falcon.
Coach: ?

A.C. Sparta: Hochmann — Hojer, Steiner — Kolenatý, Káďa, Červený — Novák, Sima, Dvořáček, Hajný, Jelínek.
Coach: Václav Špindler.

Goals: Baron, Stuttler, Etienne — Dvořáček(10min, 14min, 16min, ?, ?), Hajný(2), Sima(3), Novák. 



Dvoracek: 10min.
Dvoracek: 14min.
Dvoracek: 16min.
Hajný: 19min.
Dvoracek:
Dvoracek
Hajný
Sima
Sima

Hochamann saves penalty

Novák
Sima







A.C. Sparta - Tour of 1925/26

Benfica 5:1 (4:1)
Sporting 3:0
25/12/1925: A.C. Bilbao 0:0
27/12/1925: A.C. Bilbao 2:1
01/01/1926: F.C. Barcelona 2:2
03/01/1926: Real Zaragoza C.D. 6:1
06/01/1926: F.C. Barcelona 7:2

//10/01/1926: Red Star Komb 11:3, 15.000, Referee: Martin

Sparta: Hochmann — Hojer, Perner — Kolenatý, Kada, Cervený — Novák, Sima, Dvoracek, Hajný, Jelinék.

Dvoracek: 4, Sima 3, Hajný 2, Novák 2 — Baron, Stuttler, Etienne. 

16/01/1926: Grashoppers 7:1
17/01/1926: Young Fellows 3:1



DFC Prag Tour of 1925/26

F.C. Zurich 6:1
Grasshoppers 5:1
F.C. Milano 8:0
Calcio Reggiana 7:2 Patek 2, Szedlacsik, Less, Bobor, Kannhauser Weigelhofer. 





DFC Prag, tour of 1923/24:

23/12: F.C. Ibera 7:0 (4:0). Less 3, Sedlacek 2, Schaffer 2.
25/12: Real Sociedad(San Sebastian ?) 3:1 (2:1)
26/12: Real Sociedad(San Sebastian ?) 0:3 (0:2)




Vaník 7th & 9th

S.K. Slavia tour of 1923/24 (season break):

A.C. Bilbao: 9:2
A.C. Bilbao: 4:4
F.C. Barcelona 0:1
F.C. Barcelona 3:2
F.C. Zurich 4:3
Young Fellows 3:3




Capek(4), Stapl 2, Vaník, Kuzel, Krátá.



J. L.:

Capek: 20min
Capek: 26min
Vaník: 30min
Capek: 44min
Capek: 48min
Kratochvíl: 55min
Kuzel: 71min
Stapl: 73min
Stapl: 77min







— Félix Frascara | 1949 —

By now he should be in Colombia, joining the Los Millonarios Club. He left Buenos Aires on Tuesday, June 7. From the moment he stepped onto the steps of the plane and raised his hand in the farewell greeting, he entered the zone of the past for us. It is no longer appropriate to judge him, analyze him, or discuss him. All of this indicates activity, current events. And for Argentine football, Adolfo Pedernera is today a memory. I believe there are reasons to regret it.

He was unique. I do not establish any comparison. I am not saying that he was better or worse. I do affirm that, in me, the spectator, Pedernera produced a feeling of uniqueness. I cannot compare him with anyone and this impossibility is reassuring because it avoids doubts. Throughout a life spent watching football played in a country where the game is played as well as in Argentina, there are many images that come together when the purpose of choosing one among all arises, several of these images are confused because they look alike; With others, it happens that they remain isolated, clear, without possible confusion, on both levels with respect to the average: above, very above due to their goodness, or below, very below the level, due to their defects. When I say that Adolfo Pedernera was unique, I do not forget that for me, a spectator, some other exceptional values ​​were also unique and, why not?, also some that I simply liked because their style or their figure or an isolated fact coincided with my tastes and my sensitivity.

In 1917 I saw Alberto Ohaco play and every time I want to see him again like that afternoon I just have to close my eyes. In 1921 I saw Manuel Fleitas Solich, in 1924 José Nasazzi, in 1934 Domingos Da Guía, a trio of foreigners who impressed all football fans. But there are also hidden in the fabric of the Eyelids an Uslenghi, a Bidoglio and a Paternoster... For me, the game of Nolo Ferreira and the entire quintet of Estudiantes was unique, but more than once the journalist applauded with all his enthusiasm as a fan the plays of the black Seoane, the saves of Ángel Bosio or the admirable display of Antonio Sastre, who I am certain that no one surpassed in his condition of authentic product of the Porteño pasture. From 1927 to 1948 I have seen few back pairs like the one formed by Forrester and De Sáa, few middle lines like that of Gontade, Santamaria and Arrede, no right wing like that of Perinetti and Ochoa, few left pairs like that of Charro and the chueco García, no centre forward like Alberto Zozaya... Other names, many other names bring unforgettable silhouettes to this assembly of evocations. It is impossible to form "the" team even without any outside influence. Since that afternoon in 1917 on the old Racing field, much, much has been seen... And yet, Adolfo Pedernera appears in my memories from the highest plane

A football genius, but different, unmistakable, very personal. Football geniuses can be René Pontoni and Rubén Bravo, Gabino Sosa and José Piendibene, Ernesto Lazzatti and Evaristo Delovo. Mastery of the ball and the field, knowledge of the rival and a sense of opportunity. Masters.

However, the Adolfo Pedernera that I remember was something else. I don't want to say "more" or "less." He had the talent and the posture, the vigor and the serenity, the dominant gesture and the short dribble. I would like to define him in some way, to put in a few words my judgment, or, better yet, my memory of Pedernera. And this phrase comes up: in the game where the ball should be everything, he made the ball a secondary thing.















I have been reading for some time now the views of renowned Belgian referee John Langenus on comparisons between South American football and football played in the British Isles. Langenus, to the annoyance of some authorities on the European continent, had stated that South American football was at a higher level than British football in the late 1920s and 1930s, even though direct comparisons — direct confrontations — had not been carried out between the main forces. , with the teams completely fit, in full technical condition and physical form.

As I had already written in other lines in this file, English football, in 1920, was below more remote decades. Scottish football, on the other hand, dominated the scope of the British Isles, therefore serving as the main focus, the main power of comparison with Central Europe and, consequently, South America.

When Langenus made such comparisons, South American football, like British football, was no longer in its footballing splendor. The Uruguay of 1923 and 1924, for example, was constantly mentioned as a superior team to the 1928 and 1930 versions. Argentina, in turn, in 1930, no longer had the great names that formed great teams in the 1920s, such as Raimundo Orsi, Gabino Sosa, Ludovico Budoglio, Manuel Seoane, Americo Tesoriere, Domingo Tarasconi and among others. Although, yes, the half-back line with Juan Evaristo, Luis Monti & Arico Suárez was stronger than previous ones which Argentina had. Nevertheless, yes, it is completely plausible to say that when Langenus made such comparisons, these two world football's highest-class territories were below the other great versions they once had.

However, could it be that, even so, if such comparisons were made in the main moments of the 1920s, would South American football be, in fact, superior to Scottish football?

Why only "superior to Scottish football"? Well, I really don't believe that the best version of English football — in the 1920s, it's always good to point out — would beat the best version of Argentine football, especially the best version of Uruguayan football.

Wembley Wizards, for many who saw these superstars play, was a team's standout performance against England. Consequently, it is my point of reference for such a comparison with the Uruguay team of 1923 and 1924, even though Scotland did not win the 1927/1928 edition of the British Home Championship. Even so, Scotland almost entirely dominated that championship during the 1920s.

Both teams played in the old Scottish style, but with some tactical differences, as the Uruguayan inside forwards had a more assiduous defensive work than the Scottish insiders. Scotland, quite the opposite of Uruguay, did not have a very physical game with more severe marking and surgery. They, moreover, also lacked the hallmark of Latin football: vigor in every dispute. Scottish football was characterized by sublime technique and very high tactical knowledge, much higher than in the case of Uruguay, as well as all football played in South America.

In terms of values, the Uruguay team in 1923 and 1924 had names from the highest class in world football, such as José Nasazzi, José Leandro Andrade, Héctor Scarone, the young Pedro Petrone, Pedro Cea and a veteran Angel Romano who still produced a lot on the left side of the field. This was a formidable team indeed. Scotland, in turn, had the brilliant names in Jimmy McMullan, Alex Jackson, Hughie Gallacher, Wee Alec James and Alan Morton.

Here, for example, is my top offensive line pick at each position. After all, it was both forward lines that stood out the most in both teams.

Morton 1928                  Gallacher 1928                  Jackson 1928
A. James 1928            Scarone 1923
Mixed forward line between both.








//Player of the decade


1880s:   Nick Ross.
1890s:   Jimmy Crabtree.
1900s:   Bobby Walker.
1910s:   Patsy Gallacher.
1920s:   György Orth.
1930s:   Alex James.
1940s:   José Manuel Moreno.
1950s:   Alfredo Di Stéfano.
1960s:   Pelé.
1970s:   Johan Cruijff.
1980s:   Diego Maradona.


Some of these decades caused a certain divergence in opinion, due to the very high dispute at certain moments, which could be reflected by the number of players competing at an outstanding, the highest level possible; or for an extraordinary footballing period in just one half or a certain short period of the decade — György Orth, for instance. Just below, I will leave some explanations about certain decades, some players who could compete for the highest position to be selected from the list below or, above all, any other divergence that may be found.

Nick Ross, the Scottish full-back of, for most of the 1880s, Preston North End. To compete with Jimmy's older brother, there was another great Scottish full-back: Walter Arnott, of Queen's Park. The latter was constantly mentioned — also in the book by Alfred Gibson and William Pickford — as the best full-back in football history, even several decades after his retirement. A few years after he stopped playing, Arnott was considered by many to be the greatest player of all-time. However, curiously, so did Nick Ross, who I tend to place above his Scottish compatriot due to his greater regularity in the decade.

Another great name often mentioned in the decade is W. N. Cobbold, one of the greatest dribblers ever mentioned in football history. According to G. O. Smith, the astonishing amateur attack leader, William Neville Cobbold was the greatest player of all-time, even decades after the precise dribbler stopped playing. I, however, still opt for both full-backs, more precisely for Nick Ross.

CRABTREE OR NEEDHAM? AND BLOOMER?

In Victorian Era this was a widely debated question,  and it continued for many decades afterward  as to which of the two was better: Jimmy Crabtree or Ernest Needham. Both with exceptional qualities for their time, two footballers who stood out a lot, but with completely different personalities. Not just this question, no, but several others. After all, England had glittering names in the 1890s. From the goalkeeper to the left winger, there were too many options at the highest level for the Committee to choose.

I tend to lean towards the choice of Jimmy Crabtree, due to his versatility and naturalness on the ball. According to Ernest Needham himself, Crabtree was an almost unrivaled player.


JIMMY CRABTREE

Other big names, mostly disputed ones, emerged in the 1890s — John Goodall and G. O. Smith, for instance. For some, John Goodall was the greatest centre-forward of all-time; G. O. Smith for others. However, Steve Bloomer is another exceptional player who reached the pinnacle of his career in his first spell at Derby County.  When he reached his zenith Bloomer was considered the best forward.  He has, however, never been mentioned on a large scale as a superior footballer to both Aston Villa and Sheffield United's great half-backs.

1900s

Following the decades, football is still largely in domain of the British, even though great football talents were starting to appear in South America and, mainly, Central Europe.

On English soil some players emerge as some of the best ever produced. There was still Steve Bloomer who was still in exceptional shape. Bloomer, however, was a player who reached his peak in the late 1890s and early 1900s. He therefore possessed his divided apex. Therefore, I conclude that it would not have the regularity in an entire decade to compete with other values for the specific fit in a decade.

Names like Bob Crompton and amateur Vivian Woodward appear as two very strong candidates on the part of England. Crompton was a full-back who looked like he was made of iron, very confident and with mathematical precision in his defensive actions. Woodward was a player similar to G. O. Smith, with the difference that the Tottenham Hotspur forward was much more complete in the air, but less brilliant with the ball at his feet than his predecessor.

Both exceptional names in English football.  I, however, consider one from outside England,  though of course not from outside the British Isles. Bobby Walker, Heart of Midlothian's forward magician.

Bobby Walker is a footballer with the perfect fit for the 1900s, as well as having performed at his highest level. Walker was a natural player, a brilliant footballer who possessed one of the most versatile technical weapons that a blessed player of his time could have. A born dribbler and a unique caliber schemer. He wasn't as good a scorer as Bloomer, but he was a more spectacular football player with the ball at his feet.

1910s

With football being widely propagated throughout the European and South American continent, in addition to the beginning of the first world war, several different values emerged within the scope of world football. English football, however, according to authorities at the time, had lost its strength even before the war started. Therefore, for the perfect fit of the decade, due to a matter of regularity, a footballer from the European continent, South America or a player who was playing on British non-English soil would have to be chosen, even more than English players like Charlie Buchan, Bob Crompton, etc. had reached the highest level.

FOOTBALL EXPANDS.

On Scottish soil, there's Patsy Gallacher, Celtic F.C.'s geanial inside forward. A ball performer, Gallacher was the leading British name in the 1920s. In other territories, Imre Schlosser, from Hungary, Adolf Fischera, from Austria, Arthur Friedenreich, from Brazil, José Piendibene, from Uruguay, Alberto Ohaco, from Argentina, were some of the greatest footballers worldwide.





















The South Americans are already back in Vienna and are preparing for their match against Rapid. Interest is high, but the business aspects are not helped by the rain, which, as usual, came down again today, the day before the big attraction. The vagaries and dangers of the weather have also made the federation change its mind and take half the risk. The settlement remains in Rapid's hands, but the association will take responsibility for any shortfall and, of course, for the revenue.

National Montevideo will field the next strong team:

Mazali - Fiorentino, Arispe - Scarone, Carrera, Ghierra - Urdinaran, Castro, Nasazzi, Cea, Casanello.

So Scarone will be half again and Nasazzi will be a striker, not a back. The half-back Castro will also take his place in the team, and Urdinaran, a South American international, will make his first appearance for Vienna.

The interesting thing about Rapid is that Nitsch moves from the left of the half-back line to the centre, trying to replace Brandstätter. The other interesting thing about the Rapid team is that, with the exception of Urdinil, it will be the old Rapid strikers. This is how the
Rapid:

Jancik - Regnart, Solyl - Richter, Nitsch, Silbek - Wondrak, Wesselyck, Kuthan, Bauer, Wessely. 

Kaufmann will referee the match. Before that, a combined team from League I and II will play against an academy team.

The Vienna City team, which will face the South Americans on Sunday, will be assembled by Meisl after the Rapid match.


Friendly match: 25/06/1925, Sunday, 18:00.
S.K. Rapid — Nacional 1:2 (1:2)
Place: Hohe Warte, Vienna, Austria — Heinrich Retschury(Austria)
Attedance: about 19.000.

S.K. Rapid
Coach: Dionys Schönecker.
XI: Janczik — Renard, Solil — Richter II., Silbeck, Nitsch — Wondrak, Weselik, Kuthan, Bauer, Wesely. 

Nacional
Coach: San Martin.
XI: Clavijo — Arispe, Fiorentino — Carreras, Zibecchi, Ghierra — Castro, Scarone, Nasazzi, Cea, Cassanello.

Goals: Weselik(40min) — Nasazzi(19min), Scarone(38min).








The line of half-backs did not have several values on the sides, but there was an exceptional dispute for the position of centre-half. Some half-back lines promised great performances during the tournament; others were completely modified for the World Cup; others performed better than expected. The tournament lacked side half-backs like Gyula Lázár, who was injured in the first game against Egypt, and Walter Nausch, who was cut due to injury. These two were regarded as the continent's premier left half-backs. For example, Nausch was replaced by Hans Urbanek, who was far from performing well in the tournament.

AUSTRIAN AND CZECH DOWNGRADE

It's impressive how Austria lost a huge amount of quality during the preparation for the World Cup. Austria has already set up the following half-back lines: Braun-Smistik-Nausch, Nausch-Smistik-Gall, Wagner-Smistik-Nausch and among other exceptional ones, which had Leopold Hofmann as right half-back or centre-half. However, for this edition of the World Cup, Austria had a half-back line far below the quality of the previous ones — and that was largely due to the injury of Walter Nausch in the match against Bulgaria.

On the other hand, it is also impressive the fact that in 1920s Czechoslovakia had the duo František Kolenatý & Karel Pešek-Káďa alongside Antonín Perner, Jaroslav Červený, Emil Seifert, Josef Pleticha, Ferdinand Hajný and among other exceptional half-backs. However, the half-back line Košťálek-Čambal-Krčil did not let the supporters down, mainly because of the excepcional World Cup which Štefan Čambal had.

Mentioning only the best: Franz Wagner. The right half-back of S.K. Rapid was exceptional, marking extremely high-level opponents very well — Raimundo Orsi, for instance — and supplying the forward line very well with precise passes. Wagner was considered the best passer of the Austrian national team. Wagner's best performance was against Italy, when he was widely regarded as the best player in that battle. Hugo Meisl was quite proud of his half-back's performances.





  
ENGLAND
  
1# JOHN GOODALL
  
2# DR. TINSLEY LINDLEY





  
ARGENTINA
  
1# GABINO SOSA
  
2# JULIO LIBONATTI
  
BRAZIL
  
1# ARTHUR FRIEDENREICH
  
2# PETRONILHO DE BRITO
  
URUGUAY
  
1# PEDRO PETRONE
  
2# JOSÉ PIENDIBENE
  
OVERALL
  
1# PEDRO PETRONE
  
2# ARTHUR FRIEDENREICH






  
ENGLAND
  
G.O. SMITH
  
JOHN GOODALL







  
BRITISH ISLES
  
1# TED DRAKE
  
2# JIMMY MCGRORY
  
CENTRAL EUROPE
  
1# MATTHIAS SINDELAR
  
2# DR. GYÖRGY SÁROSI
  
3# GIUSEPPE MEAZZA
  
SOUTH AMERICA
  
1# ARSENIO ERICO
  
2# LEÔNIDAS DA SILVA
  
WESTERN EUROPE
  
1# RAYMOND BRAINE
  
2# ISIDRO LÁNGARA
  
OVERALL
  
1# MATTHIAS SINDELAR
  
2# DR. GYÖRGY SÁROSI









//Rankings: Central Europe 1920s | Players




THE HALF-BACKS

Throughout the 1920s, some half-back lines stood out from the rest, mainly being represented by Czechoslovakia players, more precisely the lines on which A.C. Sparta formed, which they had in Kolenatý, Káďa and Perner as the most prominent. However, the other two — with Jaroslav Červený, Ferdinand Hajný or Antonín Carvan — also achieved worldwide success. Another famous half-back trio of Czechoslovakia was S.K. Slavia's Vodička, Pleticha and Čipera. The choice wasn't too difficult, at least not with regard to the right half-back and centre-half. However, the dispute becomes good when the topic reaches the left side of the half-back line. There wasn't a player who excelled the others with extreme clarity, but some who reached an exceptional level to the point of choosing to become valid if you turn to any opinion.

EASY CHOICE: KOLENATÝ

In the aspect more focused on the right side, above all, I directly highlight the Czech class, as they had one of the highest values ​​for the position throughout the decade. Straight to the point, the best: František Kolenatý, of A.C. Sparta. This right half-back was an exceptionally dominant player in his position. Fast, athletic, artistic and with an advanced tactical sense. He was a skinny player, not strong, but he had a lot of stamina and determination in every action. Without any doubt, Kolenatý is the first option to this position. Czechoslovakia produced others of high level, as is the case of Antonín Vodička, the half-back of S.K. Slavia, however, did not have that much opportunity in the 1920s, as his countryman was much superior. In terms of football qualities, Vodička had nothing in special, but he was efficient to a point that he could nullify his opponent. Although he was also a fine passer, Vodička's main task was that the opposition did not have enough time to play, thus being constantly tackled.


František Kolenatý.

Perhaps the only one who could rival the skinny, lightning-fast Czech would be Vilmos Kertész — Kertész II. —, from MTK, a versatile player and more focused on offensive plays. Kertesz II. was a player with complete attributes and always praised as one of the most important figures of MTK Aranycsapat. He, however, as much as his football only improved with age, he did not play for the entire decade. Kolenatý, in addition, reached a class still superior to Kertész II. In addition to Kertész II., another Hungarian emerged to stand out in the right half-back position, and that was Ferenc Borsányi, from the Újpest ascendant. Unlike the player who was Kertész II., Borsányi was not a robust physique player and not as imaginative as the jokester Kértész, but he was a player who had an even bigger fight.

Compared to the Czech and Hungarian representatives, the Austrian class remained quite low. However, good names emerged, such as Johann Richter, from S.K. Rapid, Josef Schneider, from F.K Austria — Wiener Amateur — and Karl Kurz, from Wiener Amateur — especially the latter. Karl Kurz was part of a transitional era of level for the Wiener Amateur. In the first half of the 1920s, he was the most obvious option for Hugo Meisl. He was a representative of a school more oriented to technique than a more athletic style.

ANOTHER EASY CHOICE: KÁĎA

There are some centre-halves who are important figures in their teams; others are among the best in the world; others are the best in the world; others mark the history of football — and this is Karel Pešek-Káďa. The blonde, classy, and elegantly styled short pass and tactical perception is far above any centre-half that appeared not just in Central Europe but across the world in the 1920s. Káďa, the captain of A.C. Sparta, was in a class of his own.

After Brandstetter, some naysayers believed that a centre-half would hardly emerge that could equalize class of the S.K. Rapid's axis. They, however, were mistaken. Two players emerged to give Hugo Meisl more options: Leopold Hofmann & Josef Smistik. Both were very different players, but of the highest class, even having reached their respective peaks later. Still, for example, Hofmann was already one of the top centre-halves in the world by 1927 and Smistik boosted his level well into the late 1920s. They are, in fact, important names to be mentioned.



On the left side of the half-back, compared to the other two positions, there is a big difference between quality, as the left side is much lower — at the class level. Once again, the Czechs stand out in this position with three highly versatile players, but who showed immense quality as left half-backs: Seifert, Perner, Červený & Hajný. The first, Emil Seifert, from S.K Slavia, was a more defensive player, a technical player and focused on a tactical sense. Perner was the best of the three A.C. Sparta — Perner, Červený, Hajný — however, due to his lack of regularity in the 20s, Červený ends up standing out among Czechoslovakia's left half-backs.

However, while the Czechs had a lot of variety, they did not have the quality of a Leopold Nitsch from S.K. Rapid, which was the main half-back wing of the Austrian territory. Leo Nitsch was a shy but effective, reliable and intelligent player. Nitsch was not a tall player, no, far from it. He, however, had a robust physique, therefore capable of winning tackles against so-called tougher opponents. Over the years, Nitsch gained more and more weight, but his excellent positioning ability and excellent head and foot technique made him still a difficult obstacle to overcome. He is the team's left half-back.

   Nitsch            Káďa            Kolenatý

A complete half-back, in fact, with A.C. Sparta being superior to all other Central European halves. The ranking of the three halves ends like this:


   tr>
1# Karel Pešek-Káďa
   
2# František Kolenatý
   
3# Leopold Nitsch


GYÖRGY ORTH?